Nasal Propaganda: How the Left Wants to Snort Your Tax Dollars Through Pfizer’s Next Vaccine Scheme

Big Pharma’s Nose Job: How Corporate Media Wants You to Breathe in the Next Billion-Dollar Vaccine Scheme

Driving through my old stomping grounds of West Tennessee while being in the States after working in Asia the past couple of years, I grabbed the local paper; well, that’s how it’s presented anyway.

The Jackson Sun is the pride of small-town journalism in Jackson, TN—except when it's reduced to being a delivery mechanism for Democrat propaganda and Pfizer’s next get-rich-quick scheme.

Today’s offering is a glowing report on a nasal COVID-19 vaccine, penned by one Kerria Weaver of the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle. Let’s pause for a moment to appreciate the absurdity: A writer from Rochester, a city roughly 800 miles away and about as culturally relevant to Jackson, TN, as the surface of Neptune, is here to tell the good people of West Tennessee why they should trust Pfizer (and, by extension, her beloved Democratic overlords). What a heartwarming tale of bipartisan nonsense.

Writer Who?

First, let’s address the elephant in the newsroom: Who in the world is Kerria Weaver? And why does The Jackson Sun think its readers are lining up with bated breath to hear the gospel, according to some random Pfizer cheerleader from upstate New York?

This is classic corporate media outsourcing—why hire a local journalist to tackle local concerns when you can recycle a puff piece from someone in a state with higher taxes and fewer manners?

Weaver’s affiliation with the Democrat and Chronicle is especially rich. The word "Democrat" in the title alone is enough to make most Jackson readers spit out their Chic-Fil-A. It’s as if Pfizer, the NIH, and the entire Democratic Party huddled together and said, "Let’s find the least relatable messenger to push our nasal wonder drug."

Big Pharma’s New Nose Candy

The article enthusiastically pitches a nasal COVID-19 vaccine, claiming it will strengthen “local immunity” in the respiratory system.

Let’s translate: The last round of shots didn’t work as advertised, so now we’re trying a new gimmick. Pfizer is essentially saying,

“We couldn’t protect your lungs the first time, but maybe if you inhale this, we’ll get it right.”

Of course, the article fails to mention that Pfizer is the same company raking in billions from a vaccine that was supposed to end the pandemic.

Remember when you were told you just needed two shots to get back to normal?

Now, we’re up to boosters, nasal sprays, and who knows—maybe next year they’ll unveil COVID patches or aromatherapy candles. The bottom line is always the same: Your tax dollars are funneled to Pfizer, and they laugh all the way to the bank.

A Love Letter to the NIH

The article practically genuflects before the NIH, describing its funding and involvement with the nasal vaccine trials as if the NIH were some benevolent force of nature. Never mind that this is the same NIH that helped fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

You remember Wuhan, don’t you?

The place where COVID-19 mysteriously "emerged" from a wet market filled with bat soup and pangolins—or so they’d like us to believe.

And let’s not forget the real NIH legacy: silencing dissent, censoring early treatment options, and promoting vaccine mandates while cozying up to big pharma. It’s like asking a fox to design a new security system for your henhouse.

“Experts” or Convenient Propaganda?

The article gushes over data showing a “78% lower risk of symptomatic infection” within one month of receiving the nasal vaccine. Wow, a whole month! Let’s break out the confetti. Forgive me if I don’t fall to my knees in gratitude over a study with a sample size smaller than your average church potluck.

Meanwhile, true experts like Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Robert Malone—people with actual credentials and no corporate paychecks from Pfizer—continue to sound the alarm about these endless vaccine iterations. But no, let’s listen to the NIH and their carefully curated science. Nothing to see here, folks.

The Real Problem: The Jackson Sun’s Corporate Puppetry

Let’s get real. This isn’t journalism. This is an ad for Pfizer masquerading as news. The USA Today Network, which owns The Jackson Sun, is notorious for pushing big pharma’s agenda while pretending to care about small-town America. Do the editors in Jackson even read the nonsense they print, or do they just slap it in the paper because the USA Today mothership told them to?

This is the same playbook we’ve seen for years: Take a story written by a left-leaning journalist, sprinkle in some “expert” quotes from government-funded scientists, and publish it in a small-town paper where people might not notice the glaring conflicts of interest.

The goal is simple: Convince hardworking taxpayers to fork over more of their money to fund Pfizer’s next yacht.

Why Jackson Shouldn’t Snort the Kool-Aid

The people of Jackson, TN, deserve better than this drivel. They deserve honest reporting that doesn’t condescend to them or treat them like sheep to be herded toward the next big pharma cash grab. This isn’t about health; it’s about money and control.

So, to the good folks of Jackson: The next time you see an article like this, do yourself a favor. Ask who’s really behind it, and remember that the same people pushing these vaccines are the ones who shut down your businesses, masked your kids, and told you to "follow the science" while ignoring science that didn’t fit their narrative.

In the meantime, maybe The Jackson Sun could try hiring a local reporter who actually knows the community. Because if I wanted to read corporate propaganda, I’d just follow Pfizer on X.